Projekt
Data Protection Laws in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
The artificial intelligence (AI) has grown exponentially, which has greatly influenced the data collection, data processing, data analysis, and data dissemination. The data protection and privacy concerns of the current digital age are substantial since the applications of machine learning algorithms, big data analyti…
The artificial intelligence (AI) has grown exponentially, which has greatly influenced the data collection, data processing, data analysis, and data dissemination. The data protection and privacy concerns of the current digital age are substantial since the applications of machine learning algorithms, big data analytics, face recognitions, and predictive modeling applications are based on large amounts of personal and sensitive data. This paper focuses on the changing coexistence of AI technology and privacy rights to take a critical look at the laws of data protection in the era of the AI. It examines the nature of the artificial intelligence (AI) and data privacy in the socio-legal context and notes that algorithmic profiling and automated decision-making introduce inconveniences to the time-old ideas of responsibility, openness, transparency, and purpose limitation. The paper also analyses the way AI is reshaping the current privacy laws with particular attention to the current international data protection laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and other domestic laws on data protection. In addition, the article elicits major obstacles to implement legal protect against autonomous systems, data bias, algorithmic opacities and cross-border data flows as the privacy regulations risks posed by AI. Though the laws of data protection are established to defend the rights of the individuals, the paper reveals that the regulations must change over time to indicate the distinction threat of AI. It ends with the conclusion, that in the age of AI the basic rights of individuals should be safeguarded but innovation should be encouraged, legal systems should be technology-neutral, technology-neutral and rights-oriented.